This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jun. 24, 2009

Trolling for Efficiency

It costs more to defend patent troll claims than it does to buy them off, writes David Bohrer.

By David Bohrer

It costs more to defend patent troll claims than it does to buy them off. Lower the cost and you stop the trolls.

"Patent troll" was coined by then Intel counsel Peter Detkin as referring to companies that purchased low-value patents and then asserted the patents in nuisance laws suits. Current usage is broader, capturing any non-practicing entity that purchases patents for the sole purpose of generating revenue fro...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up