By Amy Yarbrough
Daily Journal Staff Writer A Sacramento judge was "preoccupied" with efficiency rather than a party's constitutional due process rights when he abruptly ended a couple's divorce trial to take a phone call, a judicial disciplinary panel has found. Even so, the group of three judges, or special masters, found that Superior Court Judge Peter McBrien's actions did not rise to the level of willful misconduct, the most serious offense ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer A Sacramento judge was "preoccupied" with efficiency rather than a party's constitutional due process rights when he abruptly ended a couple's divorce trial to take a phone call, a judicial disciplinary panel has found. Even so, the group of three judges, or special masters, found that Superior Court Judge Peter McBrien's actions did not rise to the level of willful misconduct, the most serious offense ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In