FOCUS COLUMN
By Jad T. Davis Interpreting an indemnitor's duty to defend obligations in California has been a speculative practice due to the absence of case law directly interpreting the duty to defend obligations separate and apart from the duty to indemnity obligations. The California Supreme Court opinion in Crawford v. Weather Shield Manufacturing Inc., 2008 DJDAR 11114, established guidelines to interpreting indemnity contracts, speci...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In