Focus (Forum & Focus)
Sep. 25, 2008
Peer (Review) Pressure
Two recent cases have addressed important aspects of peer review — the extent to which peer review participants have immunity from damages, and whether a hospital may discipline a doctor based on disciplinary actions of other hospitals, writes Geoff A. Goodman.




FOCUS COLUMN
By Geoff A. Goodman Two recent cases have addressed important aspects of peer review - the extent to which peer review participants have immunity from damages, and whether a hospital may discipline a doctor based on disciplinary actions of other hospitals. Peer reviewers will continue to enjoy immunity, but should base any actions on their own investigations, and determine judgments based solely on the issue of quality.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy
here.