In reviewing Michael MacMahon's comments of Jan. 31 on the Cunningham case and the current attempt to find an interim constitutional fix for California's sentencing laws ("Open Sentence") I can only say I hope he is right. The interim fix reintroduces indeterminate sentencing to California courts. The hope that members of the judiciary will restrain themselves and not allow sentences to creep upward to the aggravated term may be wishful thinking. Judges in California are...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In