This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Judges and Judiciary

Nov. 29, 2006

Justices Review Antitrust Liability Standard

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court expressed concern Tuesday that the federal appeals court in San Francisco may have adopted too low of an antirust liability standard when it upheld a $79 million verdict against lumber manufacturer Weyerhaeuser for purposely paying timberland owners too much for logs in an effort to raise prices and push competitors out of business.

By Brent Kendall
Daily Journal Staff Writer

      WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court expressed concern Tuesday that the federal appeals court in San Francisco may have adopted too low of an antirust liability standard when it upheld a $79 million verdict against lumber manufacturer Weyerhaeuser for purposely paying timberland owners too much for logs in an effort to raise prices and push competitors out of business.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up