Environmental
Jul. 18, 2006
'Rapanos' Wetlands Decision Doesn't Void State Regulations
Focus Column - Approximately one month ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in the consolidated cases of Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 126 US 2208 (2006).
Focus Column
By Kristina D. Lawson
Approximately one month ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in the consolidated cases of Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 126 US 2208 (2006). In the split 4-1-4 decision, the Supreme Court generally concluded that federal wetland regulators may have gone too far in restricting development on Michigan wetlands, and remanded the ...
By Kristina D. Lawson
Approximately one month ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in the consolidated cases of Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 126 US 2208 (2006). In the split 4-1-4 decision, the Supreme Court generally concluded that federal wetland regulators may have gone too far in restricting development on Michigan wetlands, and remanded the ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In