This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Family

Jan. 30, 2006

Briefly

OK FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS - California's domestic partnership laws do not violate Proposition 22, the voter initiative defining marriage as only between a man and woman, the 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled Friday.

OK FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS - California's domestic partnership laws do not violate Proposition 22, the voter initiative defining marriage as only between a man and woman, the 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled Friday.
        The decision upholds a lower court's finding that the extension of domestic partnership benefits over the years is not a violation of the state's constitution. Campaign for California...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up