This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

May 21, 2002

Comprehension Complex

Dicta Column - By Edwin V. Woodsome Jr. and David G. Meyer - Among lawyers and judges, one can find different views about the ability of an average jury to understand and reach the correct result in a complex case, such as those that involve sophisticated scientific principles, anti-competitive practices under antitrust laws or technical intricacies of prior art in patent cases.

        Dicta Column
        
        By Edwin V. Woodsome Jr. and David G. Meyer

        Among lawyers and judges, one can find different views about the ability of an average jury to understand and reach the correct result in a complex case, such as those that involve ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up