Judges and Judiciary
Feb. 15, 2002
Without the Evidence, 'Tis Truly a Puzzlement
Court Jesters - In Lee v. Porter , 63 Ga. 345 (1879), Justice Logan E. Bleckley held the following for the court: In the court below, this was a rule for the distribution of money. The parties to the present writ of error were competing creditors, each claiming a judgment lien upon the fund. This issue as to both law and fact was, by consent, tried by the court without a jury, and the judgment is excepted to generally, with no specification as to whether the error intended to be alleged was a mistaken finding upon the facts, or an erroneous ruling on some point of law.
Court Jesters
In Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345 (1879), Justice Logan E. Bleckley held the following for the court:
In the court below, this was a rule for the distribution of money. The parties to the present writ of error were competing creditors, each claiming a judgment lien upon the fund. This is...
In Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga. 345 (1879), Justice Logan E. Bleckley held the following for the court:
In the court below, this was a rule for the distribution of money. The parties to the present writ of error were competing creditors, each claiming a judgment lien upon the fund. This is...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In