Military Law
Jan. 28, 2002
Will Lindh's Statements Be Admissible Against Him?
Forum Column - By Marjorie Cohn, No evidence is more damning than the confession of a defendant in a criminal case. The U.S. government has charged John Walker Lindh with conspiracy and aiding terrorists. Lindh's statements to the government and to CNN, if admitted, will be crucial to the prosecution's case against him. There are three possible constitutional bases on which the admissibility of his statements can be analyzed.
Forum Column
By Marjorie Cohn
No evidence is more damning than the confession of a defendant in a criminal case. The U.S. government has charged John Walker Lindh with conspiracy and aiding terroris...
By Marjorie Cohn
No evidence is more damning than the confession of a defendant in a criminal case. The U.S. government has charged John Walker Lindh with conspiracy and aiding terroris...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In