Labor/Employment
Dec. 13, 2001
The Inevitable
Outside of California, the doctrine of inevitable disclosure has been used successfully by employers to prevent former employees from working for competitors. The doctrine relies on the assumption that such employment would inevitably cause the former employee to reveal trade secrets. See PepsiCo. Inc. v. Redmond , 54 F.3d 1262 (7th Cir. 1995).
By Scott Ferrell and Melinda Evans
Outside of California, the doctrine of inevitable disclosure has been used successfully by employers to prevent former employees from working for competitors. The doctrine relies on the assumption that such employment would inevitably cause the former employee to reveal trade s...
Outside of California, the doctrine of inevitable disclosure has been used successfully by employers to prevent former employees from working for competitors. The doctrine relies on the assumption that such employment would inevitably cause the former employee to reveal trade s...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In