This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Mar. 21, 2001

Court Favors Competition in Trade Dress Case

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court Tuesday resolved an important intellectual-property issue with a decidedly pro-competition ruling, unanimously holding that an innovator of flexible highway warning signs could not use the patent process to preclude another manufacturer from copying and improving its design.

By David F. Pike
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court Tuesday resolved an important intellectual-property issue with a decidedly pro-competition ruling, unanimously holding that an innovator of flexible highway warning signs could not use the patent process to preclude another manufacturer from copying and improving...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up