Constitutional Law
Sep. 14, 2000
ADULT PROGRAMMING
By Janet M. LaRue. This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to protect porn profits over children in United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group Inc., which held that Congress may not force cable operators to fully scramble or otherwise block the signals of cable channels primarily dedicated to sexually explicit programming to the homes of cable customers who do not subscribe to such programming.
By Janet M. LaRue
This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to protect porn profits over children in United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group Inc., which held that Congress may not force cable operators to fully scramble or otherwise block the signals of cable channels primarily dedicated to sexually explicit programming to the homes of cable c...
This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to protect porn profits over children in United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group Inc., which held that Congress may not force cable operators to fully scramble or otherwise block the signals of cable channels primarily dedicated to sexually explicit programming to the homes of cable c...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In