Litigation
May 30, 2000
BUTTING IN
Forum: By Elizabeth J. Cabraser Remember that intolerably bright kid in law school - the one who delighted in perverse arguments and pretzel logic? He or she has apparently gone on to represent the tobacco industry, gleefully crafting the argument accepted by a 5-4 Supreme Court in FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp ., 120 S.Ct. 1291 (2000), which held that cigarettes are too deadly to regulate under current law.
Opposing Counsel
By Elizabeth J. Cabraser
Remember that intolerably bright kid in law school - the one who delighted in perverse arguments and pretzel logic? He or she has apparently gone on to represent the tobacco industry, gleefully crafting the...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In