This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Nov. 24, 2015

Appellate decision to publish haunted house opinion spooks plaintiff lawyers

A case involving a patron who became too frightened at a haunted house will now carry legal weight

By Matthew Blake
Daily Journal Staff Writer

Throwing a scare into plaintiff lawyers, a state appellate panel on Friday published a decision finding patrons assume the risk of injury when they visit a haunted house.

Justice Gilbert Nares of the 4th District Court of Appeal expands in the opinion the primary assumption of risk doctrine, in which, "An operator of a business that provides a recreational activity posing inherent risks of in...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up