This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Apr. 22, 2015

Christa M. Anderson

Keker & Van Nest LLP San Francisco Patent


Anderson won a rare case last year representing search giant Google Inc. as an intervenor in a patent dispute.


The plaintiff in the case, Beneficial Innovations Inc., had accused Google customers such as Amazon.com Inc. of infringing patents related to online advertising methods.


Google took issue with this because the company had already settled and was paying Beneficial Innovations licensing fees for those patents. So suing Google customers on similar...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up