This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor & Employment

Jul. 16, 2014

Andrew R. Livingston

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP San Francisco Specialties: collective action defense, wage and hour lawsuits


Livingston decided repetition was the surest way a jury could understand a complex theory about unintentional discrimination against workers over 40 in an eight-week trial that ended last December.


In the defense win for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, he brought up the "disparate impact" theory at the heart of the trial even before voir dire, and hammered it repeatedly throughout the case to the closing arguments. Andrews v. Lawrence Liverm...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up