This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Feb. 27, 2014

Prisoner sex change latest flare in 'cruel and unusual' debate

In recent decades, the high court has opined that inhumane prison conditions equal cruel and unusual punishment, and a slew of lawsuits have been filed alleging inhumane conditions. By Joseph Sorrentino


By Joseph Sorrentino


Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated "the common law is not a brooding omnipresence in the sky"; "the law is what the judges say it is." Over the years the judiciary has given different interpretations to the Eight Amendment ban against cruel and unusual punishment. In recent decades, the Supreme Court has opined that inhumane prison conditions equal cruel and unusual punishment, and a staggering number of lawsuits have b...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up