This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Feb. 26, 2014

Anti-hacking law needs further clarification, defense lawyers say

Recent cases have led many defense attorneys to argue that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act needs to better define hacking, worried that a broad reading could expose everyday citizens to charges for activities considered relatively benign.


By Joshua Sebold


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Passed in 1986, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act aimed to prevent computer hacking at a time when personal computers were relatively new on the scene and the World Wide Web had yet to be conceived. Since then, efforts to interpret the law have raised questions about how to apply it to today's rapidly evolving online environment. Many experts agree that the law needs to better define hacking, and some worry...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up