On March 7, Winters found out he had helped the law evolve on what kind of invention ideas qualify for patents.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had affirmed his win in the district court that a patent-holder, Intellectual Ventures Management LLC, had no case for arguing that Winters’ clients had infringed on its ideas. Intellectual Ventures v. Erie Indemnity Co. et al., 2016-1128 and 2016-1132 (Fed. Cir., filed Oct...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In