This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Government,
Constitutional Law

Sep. 6, 2017

Pardon precedent: They cite it, but did they read it?

The pardon of Joe Arpaio has caused the stir it was apparently intended to generate — and the Daily Journal recently published a couple of the reactions to the pardon.

Kris Whitten

Retired California deputy attorney general

See more...

President Donald J. Trump's pardon of former Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio has caused the stir it was apparently intended to generate, and has also caused some to suggest that it is, or ought to be, unconstitutional. The Daily Journal has run a couple of these pieces, along with James Attridge's entertaining article (August 31, 2017) that concludes: "Presidents normally announce pardons at the end of their terms or close to Christmas, because they are inherently controversial....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up