U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court
Sep. 21, 2017
Court can clarify tolling of state law limitations
In Artis v. District of Columbia, the U.S. Supreme Court will get a chance to clarify a federal statute of limitations law governing state law claims asserted in federal court.
Jason D. Russell
Partner
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Litigation
300 S Grand Ave, Suite 3400
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 687-5000
Fax: (213) 687-5600
Email: jason.russell@skadden.com
Columbia Univ Law School
Hillary A. Hamilton
Associate
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
300 S Grand Ave #3400
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 687-5576
Fax: (213) 687-5600
Email: Hillary.hamilton@skadden.com
Univ of Virginia School of Law
Adam K. Lloyd
Counsel
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Email: adam.lloyd@skadden.com
UCLA SOL; Los Angeles CA
Matthew E. Delgado
associate
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Affiliates
litigation
300 S Grand Ave
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 687-5556
Email: matthew.delgado@skadden.com
Columbia Univ Law School
Matthew E. Delgado is an associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Affiliates.
OCTOBER 2017 TERM
In Artis v. District of Columbia, the U.S. Supreme Court will get a chance to clarify a federal statute of limitations law governing state law claims asserted in federal court. In an original jurisdiction case, 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(d) provides that the applicable statute of limitations for state law claims over which the federal court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction “shall be tolle...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In