This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
Intellectual Property,
Corporate

Oct. 4, 2017

Patent venue after TC Heartland

While some courts held that physical presence in the district is not required, others determined that it is. The Federal Circuit recently resolved this issue.

Elise Edlin

Associate
Baker Botts LLP

Email: elise.edlin@bakerbotts.com

See more...

Venue in a patent infringement action is governed by 28 U.S.C. Section 1400(b). The statute provides two tests to determine whether a particular district is the correct venue to bring an infringement action. First, venue is proper in the “judicial district where the defendant resides.” Second, venue is proper, “where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.”

$95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up