This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Family,
California Courts of Appeal,
Appellate Practice

Nov. 16, 2017

Appellate ruling gives custody dispute guidance

The decision provides guidance concerning whether written, as opposed to oral, statements of decision are required in bench trials. It also reaffirms the notion that changes in visitation are decided on a "best interests of the children" basis, and not on whether circumstances have changed materially enough to warrant a new order.

Claudia Ribet

Of Counsel
California Appellate Law Group LLP

appellate law (certified) and family law (certified)

811 Wilshire Blvd 17th Floor
Los Angeles , California 90017

Phone: (213) 878-0404

Antioch School of Law

California Appellate Law Group LLP is an appellate boutique with offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles. Claudia is one of only three attorneys in California certified by the State Bar as a specialist in both family law and appellate law. Find out more about Claudia and the California Appellate Law Group LLP at www.calapplaw.com. Appellate Zealots is a monthly column on recent appellate decisions and appellate issues written by the attorneys of the California Appellate Law Group LLP.

See more...

On its face, the 2nd District Court of Appeal's opinion in the case of In re Marriage of Furie, 2017 DJDAR 10419 (Nov. 1, 2017), purports on the face of it to be a run-of-the-mill family law decision involving a request, to reduce child support. In fact the decision provides guidance concerning whether written, as opposed to oral, statements of decision are required in bench trials. It also reaffirms the notion that changes in visitation ar...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up