Year in Review Column,
U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
Corporate,
Constitutional Law
Dec. 14, 2017
Defense strategies shift in Spokeo's wake
It has been more than 18 months since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision holding that a bare, technical violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act is not sufficient to confer Article III standing.
Cary D. Sullivan
Partner
Jones Day
Phone: (949) 553-7513
Univ of San Diego School of Law
Cary is a partner in the firm's Business & Tort Litigation practice.
Chris Waidelich
Associate
Jones Day
4655 Executive Dr Ste 1500
San Diego , CA 92121-3134
Phone: (858) 314-1200
Email: cwaidelich@jonesday.com
Notre Dame Law School
Chris is based in the San Diego office of Jones Day.
2017 IN REVIEW
It has been more than 18 months since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Spokeo v. Robins, holding that a bare, technical violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act is not sufficient to confer Article III standing. Some defense-oriented commentators quickly speculated that Spokeo might represent a paradigm shift in defending against so-called "no injury" class actions. While Spokeo so far ha...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In