This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
Administrative/Regulatory

Jan. 18, 2018

Justices weigh overtime rules

On Wednesday, the nation's highest court heard oral argument in a case which may send a broader signal as to whether the Trump administration and the new conservative-leaning Supreme Court will follow prior doctrine of construing federal overtime exemptions narrowly against employers

Christian J. Scali

Managing Partner
Scali Rasmussen

Email: cscali@scalilaw.com

See more...

Jennifer Woo Burns

Partner
Scali Rasmussen

Email: jburns@scalilaw.com

See more...

Jack Schaedel

Employment Law Neutral
Alternative Resolution Centers

UCLA Law School

Jack Schaedel is an employment law neutral with Alternative Resolution Centers. Over the course of his career, he represented and advised both employees and employers in high-stakes litigation while also mediating cases through the LA Superior Court. He founded and chaired the Labor & Employment Section of the Pasadena Bar Association and serves on the Executive Committee of the Labor & Employment Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association

See more...

OCTOBER 2017 TERM

On Wednesday, the nation's highest court heard oral argument for its second review of Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 161362. (See below for transcript.) This case arises over a specific and narrow job classification under the Fair Labor Standards Act, but the decision may send a broader signal as to whether the Trump administration and the new conservative-leaning Supreme Court will follow prior...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up