This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Corporate,
Construction,
California Supreme Court

Feb. 13, 2018

Intentional interference claims and losing bidders

What about after a contract is awarded? Is there a remedy available to unsuccessful bidders after an apparent low bidder is awarded a contract and, if so, is that remedy a claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage?

Garret D. Murai

Partner
Nomos LLP

Garret is the editor of the California Construction Law Blog at www.calconstructionlawblog.com.

See more...

CONSTRUCTION CORNER

In California, most public works projects are subject to the state's competitive bidding laws which require that interested contractors submit bids for the project and, from these bids, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder is awarded the contract.

Unsuccessful bidders can file a bid protest if they contend that an apparent low bidder's bid is either non-responsive (i.e., the bid is...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up