This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
Administrative/Regulatory

Mar. 22, 2018

Joint-employer standard left unsettled after NLRB vacates ruling

Franchisors must be mindful of their business practices to avoid being held liable for labor law violations committed by franchisees and contractors, and to avoid assuming new collective bargaining obligations.

Charles S. Birenbaum

Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig LLP

Email: birenbaumc@gtlaw.com

Charles is chair of the firm's Northern California and co-chair of the firm's Labor & Employment Practice's Labor-Management Relations group.

See more...

Jamie R. Rich

Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig LLP

Email: richj@gtlaw.com

Jamie represents clients in labor and employment suits in state and federal court.

See more...

Lindsay E. Hutner

Of Counsel
Greenberg Traurig LLP

Phone: (415) 655-1312

Email: hutnerl@gtlaw.com

USC Law School; Los Angeles CA

Lindsay focuses her practice on employment law, with an emphasis on litigation matters.

See more...

Brenda L. Rosales

See more...

Joint-employer standard left unsettled after NLRB vacates ruling
NLRB Member William Emanuel

The National Labor Relations Board recently issued an order vacating its decision in Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors, Ltd. and Brandt Construction Co., 365 NLRB No. 156 (2017). The decision was vacated in light of the determination by the NLRB's Designated Agency Ethics Office that Member William J. Emanuel should have been disqualified from participating in the proceeding. Emanuel is a former management-side attorney whose prior law firm, ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up