Civil Litigation,
Intellectual Property
Apr. 18, 2018
Making sense of patent damages after Exmark
At first glance, the January decision appears to turn a decade of patent damages jurisprudence on its head.
Alyssa M. Caridis
Partner
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Phone: (213) 612-2372
Email: acaridis@orrick.com
Loyola Law School; Los Angeles CA
This column appeared in the April 18 TOP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWYERS special report.
[Federal Circuit rulings attached below.]
At first glance, the January decision in Exmark Manufactuing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton, 879 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2018) , appears to turn a decade of patent damages jurisprudence on its head. In that opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit proclaimed that ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In