Civil Litigation,
Criminal
May 4, 2018
Nonconsensual pornography, case-by-case
An exploration of recent nonconsensual pornography cases reveals hurdles victims and advocates face in fighting back against this form of online harassment.
Heralded as a victory for advocates and victims seeking justice for the distribution of nonconsensual pornography, the recent judgment in Jane Doe v. David K. Elam II (2:14-cv-09788, Central District of California), the details of the case, and the situation from which the proceedings arose shine a light on the challenges that victims and advocates trying to curb these practices -- lawyers, social workers, victim advocates and prosecutors -...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In