U.S. Supreme Court,
Administrative/Regulatory
Jul. 12, 2018
Is NIFLA the death knell for Prop 65 warnings?
Did the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling sound the death knell for these notice requirements that have burdened manufacturers, retailers and many others doing business in California since Prop 65 was approved by voters in 1986.
Steven L. Feldman
Partner
Goldfarb Sturman & Averbach
15760 Ventura Boulevard
Encino , CA 91436
Email: sfeldman@gsalaw.com
Steven L. Crane
Associate
Goldfarb Sturman & Averbach
civil litigation
15760 Ventura Blvd #1900
Encino , CA 91436-3120
Phone: (818) 990-4414
Fax: (818) 905-7173
UCLA School of Law
OCTOBER 2017 TERM
We are all familiar with the ubiquitous notices at checkout counters and building entryways, on store shelves and product packaging that warn us we are about to purchase a product or enter an area "containing a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer" or "birth defects or other reproductive harm." Such notices are posted by retailers, property owners, distributors, manufacturers and other businesses to compl...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In