Family
Jul. 16, 2018
Gifts from a ‘sugar daddy’ won’t necessarily reduce child support
A Court of Appeal decision discusses whether recurring gifts may be considered “income” for child support purposes.
Jeffrey P. Blum
Law Office of Jeffrey P. BlumEmail: Blumesq@aol.com
Jeffrey is a mediator and family law attorney in Los Altos.
If you want a case that shows the epitome of a "sugar daddy," read Anna M. v. Jeffrey E., 7 Cal. App. 5th 439 (2017). The decision discusses whether recurring gifts may be considered "income" for child support purposes. (I use the slang term "sugar daddy" here to mean someone who offers financial and material support to another.)
Marriage of Alter, 171 Cal. App. 4th 718 (2009), ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In