This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Government,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility,
Criminal,
State Bar & Bar Associations

Sep. 17, 2018

Accountability for prosecutorial misconduct

Something rare is happening in San Francisco — a prosecutor who has been accused of misconduct is being tried by the State Bar on charges of intentionally suppressing evidence in a murder trial.

Jeff Adachi

Public Defender
San Francisco Public Defender's Office

See more...

Peter Calloway

Fellow
San Francisco Public Defender's Office

See more...

Something rare is happening in San Francisco -- a prosecutor who has been accused of misconduct is being tried by the State Bar on charges of intentionally suppressing evidence in a murder trial.

Cases of prosecutorial misconduct almost never go before the State Bar Court, but not because misconduct doesn't occur. No, these cases are rarely tried because often other prosecutors do their best to protect their own.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up