Health Care & Hospital Law,
Government,
Administrative/Regulatory,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Nov. 21, 2018
State, DOJ, plaintiffs say contraceptive mandate case is moot, but what about standing?
The U.S. Department of Justice wants a federal appeals court to rule that California cannot challenge new Trump administration rules exempting certain employers from the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate, despite the fact that it argues existing litigation over the issue is moot.
The U.S. Department of Justice wants a federal appeals court to rule that California cannot challenge new Trump administration rules exempting certain employers from the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate, despite the fact that it argues existing litigation over the issue is moot.
In recent court filings, government attorneys told the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals it should rule that five states challenging the regulatio...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor/Employment, Health Care & Hospital Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Split 9th circuit panel blocks rules allowing employers to opt out of free birth control
By Justin Kloczko
Health Care & Hospital Law, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
9th Circuit hears arguments in latest contraceptive mandate battle
By Nicolas Sonnenburg
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado v. Burwell
Does the availability of a regulatory method for nonprofit religious employers to comply with HHS's contraceptive mandate eliminate either the substantial burden on religious exercise or ...
