Entertainment & Sports,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Nov. 23, 2018
In trial closing, student-athletes argue new compensation model wouldn’t change NCAA
In the potentially landscape-altering antitrust trial in which former National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes are fighting for a bigger stake in the multibillion dollar industry, plaintiffs’ attorneys argued their proposal to replace the current compensation model is identical to the status quo.
In the potentially landscape-altering antitrust trial in which former National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes are fighting for a bigger stake in the multibillion dollar industry, the plaintiffs' attorneys argued their proposal to replace the current compensation model is identical to the status quo.
The NCAA already allows its conferences to establish independent rules overseeing player compensation, which has not a...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Entertainment & Sports, Antitrust & Trade Reg.
NCAA appeals, while plaintiffs seek $45 million in attorney fees
By Carter Stoddard
Antitrust
O'Bannon v. NCAA
NCAA may permit schools to provide up to the cost of attendance to student-athletes but is not required to allow $5,000 yearly payment.
