This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters,
State Bar & Bar Associations

Dec. 3, 2018

Just lowering ‘cut score’ ignores other factors

I agree with Howard Miller on one point: The bar exam is to test minimum competence to practice law. I disagree with everything else he says.

Arnold E. Sklar

Partner
Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley PC

Email: arnold.sklar@ropers.com

See more...

I agree with Howard Miller on one point: The bar exam is to test minimum competence to practice law. I disagree with everything else he says. ("Bar exam blues," Nov. 21.) Full disclosure: I was graduated from USC Law School and I passed the bar exam (a long time ago); neither my kids nor they spouses have or will go to law school.

Having a minimum standard of competence is fair. As ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up