This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Intellectual Property

Dec. 21, 2018

A potential source of disharmony in claim construction standards

We recently wrote about how the Patent Office’s new rule could create disharmony in claim construction. Today we discuss the potential implications of that disharmony.

Jim Glass

Partner
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

See more...

Samuel Jacobs

Associate
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

See more...

Shutterstock

Part I of this article discussed the expressed justifications for applying the "broadest reasonable interpretation" claim construction sta...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up