Intellectual Property,
Criminal
Feb. 27, 2019
Implications of trademark forfeiture in US vs Mongol Nation
Last month, District Judge David O. Carter invited the submission of amicus briefs to address a series of questions regarding the implications of criminal forfeiture.
Jennifer Rothman
Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
Email: jennifer.rothman@lls.edu
Jennifer is the Joseph Scott Fellow at Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. She is an elected member of the American Law Institute and an affiliated fellow at the Yale Information Society Project at Yale Law School. She is the creator of Rothman's Roadmap to the Right of Publicity,www.rightofpublicityroadmap.com.
Last month, District Judge David O. Carter of the Central District of California invited the submission of amicus briefs to address a series of questions arising from litigation in United States v. Mongol Nation, CR13-0106-DOC, an ongoing case brought by the United States against a motorcycle gang, Mongol Nation. The government has sought through criminal forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1963(a)(1) of the Racketeer Influenced and C...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In