This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Banking,
Administrative/Regulatory

Mar. 19, 2019

What the 51 percent attack tells us about blockchain security

In early January, Chinese blockchain security firm SlowMist and U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase separately announced that they had uncovered evidence of reversed transactions on the Ethereum Classic blockchain.

Chaz M. Hales

Associate
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Email: chaz.hales@pillsburylaw.com

See more...

What the 51 percent attack tells us about blockchain security
Shutterstock

In early January, Chinese blockchain security firm SlowMist and U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase separately announced that they had uncovered evidence of reversed transactions on the Ethereum Classic (ETC) blockchain. The product of a "51 percent attack," these transaction reversals allowed some ETC tokens to be spent twice, a cardinal sin in cryptocurrency called a "double spend," and the exact problem blockchains were invented to solve.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up