Intellectual Property
May 7, 2019
San Francisco-area judges, appellate courts skeptical of artificial intelligence patents
While major technology giants and smaller companies are acquiring patents on artificial intelligence technology at a rapid clip, judges in the San Francisco Bay Area and federal appellate courts are rejecting claims of ownership to overbroad applications of those patents.
While major technology giants and smaller companies are acquiring patents on artificial intelligence technology at a rapid clip, judges are rejecting claims of ownership to applications that appear to be overly broad.
Courts have largely dismissed patentee allegations of infringement, concluding the allegedly stolen ideas are unenforceable abstract concepts.
"Every single industry uses artificial i...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Government, Civil Litigation
AT&T, Verizon to pay $116M for overcharging government entities
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Intellectual Property
Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International
Patent claims covering scheme for mitigating settlement risk in financial exchanges with computer system as intermediary are nonpatentable as abstract ideas.
