This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

May 29, 2019

Supreme Court places limits on retaliatory arrest claims brought under First Amendment

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday shot down First Amendment claims advanced by an Alaskan partygoer who said police officers arrested him in retaliation after he refused to speak to them during a 2014 festival, setting what dissenting justices said was a bright-line rule eliminating nearly all constitutional claims when probable cause exists.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday shot down First Amendment claims advanced by an Alaskan party-goer who said police officers arrested him in retaliation after he refused to speak to them during a 2014 festival, setting what dissenting justices said was a bright-line rule eliminating many constitutional claims when probable cause exists.

Despite taking three cases since 2012 involving the interplay between free speech protections an...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up