Civil Litigation
Jun. 5, 2019
State’s rule saying coffee chemical isn’t cancerous affects pending suit
Now that the state of California has adopted a regulation stating chemicals in coffee don’t pose a cancer risk, parties will fight over its validity as it relates to pending litigation in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Now that the state has adopted a regulation stating chemicals in coffee don't pose a cancer risk, parties will fight over its validity as it relates to pending litigation in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Last year Judge Elihu M. Berle ruled coffee producers and vendors did not establish there was any safe level of acrylamide, a chemical the industry says is key to mak...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
Coffee defendants can use state regulation as defense
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Prop 65 plaintiff: State previously said coffee is hazardous
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Health Care & Hospital Law, Government
State’s OK of coffee risk admitted in long-running case
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Government
Validity of coffee warning label exemption back to original judge
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
State cites privileged documents in coffee labeling case
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal
Appellate court stays Starbucks coffee labeling case on eve of civil penalties phase
By Justin Kloczko
