This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Jul. 1, 2019

Bill for wildfire mitigation fund doesn’t change inverse condemnation rule

A bill introduced last week would devote billions to a wildfire liability fund and modify the burden of proof in cases stemming from wildfire damage. But it wouldn’t touch what some call are the “third rail” of California wildfire law: the inverse condemnation standard.

A bill introduced last week would devote billions to a wildfire liability fund and modify the burden of proof in cases stemming from wildfire damage. But it wouldn’t touch what some call a third rail of California wildfire law: the inverse condemnation standard.

New language showed up Thursday night via amendments to an existing bill, AB 1054. That came just a week after Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he wanted to establish a wildfire...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up