U.S. Supreme Court,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jul. 3, 2019
After remand, divided 9th Circuit panel allows warning labels on cell phones in Berkeley
The city of Berkeley can keep requiring cell phone retailers to alert customers to the risk of radio-frequency radiation exposure, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals once again ruled Tuesday, reaffirming an opinion the U.S. Supreme Court had directed the circuit to reconsider.
The city of Berkeley can keep requiring cellphone retailers to alert customers to the risk of radio-frequency radiation exposure, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals once again ruled Tuesday, reaffirming an opinion the U.S. Supreme Court had directed the circuit to reconsider.
Tuesday's decision by a divided court preserves not only Berkeley's ordinance, but governmental authority more broadly to prescribe consumer warnings in di...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
CTIA v. City of Berkeley
Challenged Berkeley ordinance was reasonably related to substantial governmental interest in public health and safety and its text was literally true, so it survived plaintiff's First Ame...
Constitutional Law
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
California law requiring state-drafted notice be disseminated in licensed pregnancy centers fails intermediate scrutiny as 'wildly underinclusive' and not properly tailored.
Constitutional Law
CTIA v. City of Berkeley
City ordinance requiring cellphone providers to post FCC safety guidelines in stores not violative of First Amendment, as City has interest in limiting commercial speech to promote public...
