This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment

Jul. 10, 2019

Avoiding the ban on noncompetes: Is it possible?

Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery did an about face and upheld a Delaware choice-of-law provision in an employment agreement between a Delaware employer and a California employee, ultimately recognizing the enforceability of the noncompete.

Wendy M. Lazerson

Partner
Sidley Austin LLP

1001 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto , CA 94304

Email: wlazerson@sidley.com

Union University, Albany Law School

See more...

Katharine M. Miner

Associate
Sidley Austin LLP

Email: kminer@sidely.com

Katharine is based in the firm's Palo Alto office and a member of the Labor, Employment and Immigration group. She can be reached at kminer@sidley.com.

See more...

Avoiding the ban on noncompetes: Is it possible?
Shutterstock

California's disfavoring of covenants not to compete is no secret. Business and Professions Code Section 16600 states it plainly enough: "[E]very contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void." This belief in employee mobility was recently underscored by the case of $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up