Civil Litigation
Sep. 17, 2019
Prop 65 plaintiff: State previously said coffee is hazardous
A new battle is brewing in the nearly 10-year-long litigation over a cancer link in coffee, this time regarding a new law stating the beverage is not hazardous.
A new battle is brewing in the nearly 10-year-long litigation over a cancer link in coffee, this time regarding a law stating the beverage is not hazardous.
After a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge ruled that coffee industry attorneys could use the regulation as a defense, plaintiff Council for the Education and Research on Toxics, or CERT, is preparing to put forth a number of legal theories as to why the regulation is invali...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, Health Care & Hospital Law, Government
State’s OK of coffee risk admitted in long-running case
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Proposition 65 should not include acrylamide, Chamber says
By Glenn Jeffers
Civil Litigation, Government
Group seeking warning labels on coffee wants to intervene in another case
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Civil Litigation, Government
Plaintiff files 8 motions to beat coffee makers’ use of state regulation as defense
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Coffee defendants can use state regulation as defense
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Judge mulling whether state agencies must release attorney communications
By Carter Stoddard
Civil Litigation
State’s rule saying coffee chemical isn’t cancerous affects pending suit
By Justin Kloczko