Civil Litigation,
Health Care & Hospital Law,
Government
Oct. 4, 2019
State’s OK of coffee risk admitted in long-running case
A judge in the nearly decade-long coffee labeling case allowed into evidence Thursday a new regulation stating coffee isn’t hazardous, but did not allow the agency that presented the rule to become a defendant in the matter.
LOS ANGELES -- A judge in the nearly decade-long coffee labeling case allowed into evidence Thursday a new regulation stating coffee isn't hazardous but did not allow the agency that presented the rule to become a defendant in the matter.
In his ruling, Superior Court Judge Elihu M. Berle granted coffee companies' motion to amend their complaint and include the new r...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, Health Care & Hospital Law, Government
State’s OK of coffee risk admitted in long-running case
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Proposition 65 should not include acrylamide, Chamber says
By Glenn Jeffers
Civil Litigation, Government
Group seeking warning labels on coffee wants to intervene in another case
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Civil Litigation, Government
Plaintiff files 8 motions to beat coffee makers’ use of state regulation as defense
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Government
Warning label requirements for chemical in coffee said to be unconstitutional
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Government
Judge denies administrative record motion in Starbucks case
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Decade-long coffee labeling case ends with summary judgment for defense
By Blaise Scemama
Civil Litigation, Health Care & Hospital Law, Government
New battle brewing over whether coffee requires a warning label
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Prop 65 plaintiff: State previously said coffee is hazardous
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Coffee defendants can use state regulation as defense
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Health Care & Hospital Law, Government
State’s OK of coffee risk admitted in long-running case
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
State’s rule saying coffee chemical isn’t cancerous affects pending suit
By Justin Kloczko