U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation
Oct. 8, 2019
Winston & Strawn can’t force ex-partner into arbitration
A 1st District Court of Appeal ruling that rejected Winston & Strawn LLP's arbitration requirement in a sex harassment claim will remain in place after the U.S. Supreme Court denied a cert petition on Monday.
A 1st District Court of Appeal ruling that rejected Winston & Strawn LLP's arbitration requirement in a sex harassment claim will remain in place after the U.S. Supreme Court denied a cert petition on Monday.
The decision means a gender discrimination lawsuit against the firm by former partner Constance Ramos can proceed in San Francisco County Superior Court, where it had been stayed as defense attorneys at Orrick, Herrington &...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, Law Practice
US high court reply seeks to discredit lawyer’s arbitration claim
By Glenn Jeffers
Law Practice
Winston & Strawn LLP adds 2 new office managing partners in California
By Matthew Sanderson
