This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
Intellectual Property

Oct. 9, 2019

Enforceability of hold-out restrictive covenants increasingly in doubt in California

California's longstanding emphasis on employee mobility and unique skepticism of most noncompete agreements is well-known. Still, certain restrictive covenants, such as prohibitions on post-employment recruitment of former colleagues ("employee nonsolicits") and nondisclosure agreements protecting confidential information have been generally considered enforceable nonetheless.

Laura D. Smolowe

Partner
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP

350 S Grand Ave.
Los Angeles , ca 90071

Phone: (213) 683-9113

Email: laura.smolowe@mto.com

Yale Law School; New Haven CT

Laura co-leads the firm's Trade Secret and Employee Mobility Practice Group. She can be reached at Laura.Smolowe@mto.com.

See more...

THIS ARTICLE APPEARED IN THE OCT. 9 TOP TRADE SECRETS LAWYERS SUPPLEMENT

California's longstanding emphasis on employee mobility and unique skepticism of most noncompete agreements is well-known. Still, certain restrictive covenants, such as prohibitions on post-employment recruitment of former colleagues ("employee nonsolicits") and nondisclosure agreements protecting confidential information have been generally considered enforceable nonetheless.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up